Volunteering Time vs Charitable Donations
When it comes to making charitable donations and volunteering time there is no doubt that both types of contributions are much appreciated by the organizations that receive them, and by those that ultimately benefit. The interesting thing that I’ve run into in doing a fairly substantial amount of volunteering is the attitude of those that put the boots on the ground toward some of the people that “only” make monetary donations.
After doing a whole day of sandbagging, or helping out over a dinner rush in a soup kitchen, it can be awful tempting to say, “Must be nice to just write a cheque and spend your guilt away,” but is that realistically a good attitude to have? In fact, from an economist’s point of view, looking at pure outcomes, couldn’t people that donate money as opposed to time actually have quite a strong claim to helping more at the end of the day?
Show Me The Money
To make an accurate “apples to apples” comparison I’m going to try and look at the situation in terms of final outcomes as opposed to the grey moral aspect of this debate. In order to do that, we must first state that everyone’s time is worth a different amount of money. We don’t like to admit this, and it isn’t politically correct to say. This is likely because it sounds very similar to “some peoples’ lives are worth more than others’,” which of course a pretty scary thought indeed.
The idea that an hour of work for one person has a different value than an hour of work for another person might seem awkward for some people, by the market pretty clearly dictates that some peoples’ skills and knowledge are worth more than others. If we believe this to be true, then doesn’t it follow that if a world class entertainer, or a doctor for example donates an hour of their time (say $300 worth of market value), isn’t that worth substantially more than a high school student volunteering for a couple of hours after school?
It’s an interesting quandary, because if we look at it in purely financial terms, one could say the doctor’s hour is worth 30 or so hours of volunteer time from the high school student if they are working at minimum wage; however, I think most people would agree that with 30 hours of volunteer work the high school student has made a bigger sacrifice. Then the question becomes should he feel morally superior? Or should they feel equal since a person earning a lot of money has presumably made great investment choices, or spent a lot of time honing their craft, or worked very hard to reach an elite status in their field? Should that time investment that allowed them to volunteer the quantity of money that they did be factored into the equation as well?
Does Morals or Hard Work Feed The Homeless?
There is one other avenue of this debate that we might want to explore. That is, what if the aforementioned doctor simply paid a high school student to work the 30 hours at minimum wage for the charity he wishes to donate to. Now, not only has the doctor contributed a great amount to society, he has actually helped the economy by creating a job too right? Is this philanthropy the best of all worlds since it creates so many positive outcomes? The government seems to believe so since it gives a pretty decent monetary incentive to donate to charities in the form of a tax credit, whereas there are not many incentives to volunteering time that I ever seen (recent Federal volunteer fire fighter tax credit aside).
It’s interesting to note that a charity would be way further ahead to pay people to come work, then have those people donate the money to generate a tax credit for themselves. I’ve never heard of this being done, but it might be an interesting way for a desperate charity to boost the pairs of hands it has available.
If someone has a skill set that makes them very good at allocating capital or writing novels, isn’t it everyone’s best interests for them to donate an extra hour at work as opposed to helping pass out food at a food kitchen? Yet for some reason we look down on these people. At the same time, I know the feeling of personal sacrifice doesn’t feel the same when you cut a check as opposed to getting down and dirty somewhere to get a job done, so there must be some inherent truth there as well.
Where do you stand? Is one sort of good deed better than another? Do you tend to donate more time or money?
I think when you’re young (ok, when you’re poor), the time trade-off is more impactful for you and the charity. It’s great to have young people involved in a charity, since they typically have more energy and it rubs off on everyone around them.
As you get older and can afford to contribute meaningful dollars, then donating money has more impact than struggling to find a day to volunteer.
The hotel I worked for used to cook a pancake breakfast for the Canadian Cancer Society Relay for Life. This involved getting 8-12 managers out at 4am to get the pancakes ready and hauled out to the event site. After a few years of slogging our ovens and equipment through the muddy field, our chef finally said, “Why don’t we just write them a cheque for $500 and be done with it!”.
Because that $500 check will become $350 after administrative costs. (Most non-profits aim for about ~25-35% administrative costs). I agree that for you, the potential volunteer, it is more effective impact to give money, but to the recipients all the way downstream, I still think it has more impact to give your time.
If that’s not an option, I would suggest that individuals and organizations donate goods rather than money – then you know that your donation isn’t going to be whittled away to pay someone’s salary.
I have no problem with my contribution paying someone’s salary who has made their lifes about something i believe in.those people need to be supported in order to keep doin the work they do. In fact i have given canvasses money directly to them along with contributions. I don’t have much but I feel that financial support is critical. I haven’t volunteered much but I’ve given a motor money over the years even though I’m pretty poor. I think every individuals contribution should be respected equally. No one has to do any of it, so they should be honored for whatever way they give whether it’s time, goods, or financial resources.
Your timing is interesting. I have wanted to volunteer for more than a year and something always got in the way. I will start this month volunteering at a homeless shelter giving out food. Personally, I think volunteering is much more rewarding than just giving a check.
Personally, I would rather invest my own time in a cause than support the organization financially. This way you are 100% certain where your efforts are going and decrease the risk of paying costly overhead for the organization to do it’s work.
I was going to reply to this and then Brian beat me to it! I also would add that some things cost MORE for an organization to pay for than to volunteer.
For example, driving cancer patients to appointments (especially single or elderly patients) is one of the best things you can do. For an organization to purchase cars, hire drivers, etc., it is way less cost effective than finding a few dedicated volunteers.
I don’t understand what’s so distasteful anout people who do have a career in the cause you care about receiving a portion of your donation for the work they do. If they weren’t supported for their lives expenses they couldn’t keep doing what they are doing. That’s part of why financial contributions are so critical.
It also depends on the organization. Arbor day foundation needs money more than volunteers so they can buy land that would otherwise be clear cut. You can’t volunteer enough to salvage the land the save with money from their contributers. In fact most environmental organizations depend on money to hire lobbyists and lawyers to get policies changed. You can’t volunteer as a lobbyist or a lawyer
People have to be paid so they can keep doing the work! Don’t you care about the livelihood of the people who have devoted their lives to a cause you believe in? I don’t understand why someone volunteer to avoid supporting the people who work for the cause. People need food and shelter to live and that requires money. If they weren’t paid to do that work they would have to do something else and there would be no organization